Summary
When debating the best games in theCall of Dutyfranchise, a few entries in the series are often brought up.Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfarenot only changed the FPS genre through its campaign, but its simplicity with killstreaks and memorable maps helped its multiplayer thrive.Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2not only had one of the most action-packed campaigns of the series, but also an absurdly fun multiplayer that shined in part because it was so unbalanced.The first twoBlack Opsgamesare also mentioned in the conversation of “bestCoDgame,” as their twist-filled stories were well-written, their multiplayer modes were deep and competitive, and they took Zombies to new heights. However, another game should be mentioned more:World at War.
The brilliantBlack Opssubseries was built from what Treyarch learned in 2008’sCall of Duty: World at War. So much of the game worked well, and it was a nice change of pace from 2007’s flashyModern Warfare. The campaign had its share ofCall of Dutysetpiecesand big moments, but also aimed to explore the grittiness of World War 2, ensuring that it did not shy away from violence. Multiplayer was much likeCall of Duty 4but with a World War 2 aesthetic, meaning it was simple and fun, whileCoDZombies got its start here. Unfortunately, it feels likeWorld at Warhas been lost to history, with Activision failing to give it the love it deserves.
Call of Duty: World at War Deserves More Appreciation
Why Call of Duty: World at War is So Special
In terms of campaigns,Call of Duty: World at Warfeels different from other entries in the series. It is still a fantasized version of World War 2, but Treyarch did do its research, and the historical elements of the game make it feel more serious than a lot of the franchise’s other campaigns. This is a nice change of pace, as is the co-op option, which allows players to go through the missions with a friend. Though othercampaigns likeBlack Ops 3have tried co-op, it worked particularly well here, especially when adding Death Cards to the mix. Essentially theCoDequivalent ofHalo’s skulls, these modifiers added a lot of replayability to the mode.
Plenty has been said aboutCall of DutyZombies losing its way in recent years, but in its early days, it was unstoppable. A surprise success, Nazi Zombies went from a bonus mode that unlocked after the campaign to a cultural phenomenon, improving with eachWorld at Warmap and peaking with the timeless Der Riese. As for multiplayer, using classic guns like the StG and the PPSh in the beachy Makin and rocky Cliffside never got old. With some players finding newer games overly complex, a low number of streaks and simple attachment system likeWorld at Warhad may seem refreshing, just asModern Warfare Remasteredwas in 2016. Sadly, with the game now full of hackers, it is impossible to experienceWorld at Warmultiplayer properly today. Unless a remaster comes, as the game is too old now to waste time on patches, its multiplayer will stay forgotten.
Call of Duty: World at Warwas whereTreyarch’s beloved Zombies modestarted, with all four of its maps remade several times. Despite this, players still return to the original versions, as they miss the classic weapons and gloomier aestheticWorld at Warbrought to the table.
A Call of Duty: World at War Remake Should Happen
Considering that Viktor Reznov was a key character in the originalBlack Opsgame, if campaign or full remasters for theBlack Opsseries ever happen, it would make sense for a new version ofWorld at Warto be made first. After all, this is where the Black Ops timeline really begins, and it deserves to be recognized as such. A remake or remaster could allow issues like the grenade spam in Veteran to be solved, too. Plus, even though Castle and Dome have been revived, many ofWorld at War’s multiplayer maps have not been seen in over a decade, meaning that they would feel fresh for many. And while Zombies fans may balk at yet another remake ofNacht Der Untotenor Shi No Numa, if they are truly faithful remakes that have the creepy vibes of the originals as well as all the old guns, they would be a bit more exciting.World at Wardeserves to be in the discussion about the bestCoDgames, and a fresh coat of paint could remind fans just how good it is.
Call of Duty: World at War
WHERE TO PLAY
Call of Duty is back, redefining war like you’ve never experienced before. Building on the Call of Duty 4®: Modern Warfare engine, Call of Duty: World at War immerses players into the most gritty and chaotic WWII combat ever experienced. Players band together to survive the most harrowing and climactic battles that led to the demise of the Axis powers on the European and Pacific fronts. The title offers an uncensored experience with unique enemies and combat variety, including Kamikaze fighters, ambush attacks, Banzai charges and cunning cover tactics, as well as explosive on-screen action through the all new four-player cooperative campaign. The addictive competitive multiplayer has also been enhanced with new infantry and vehicle-based action, a higher level cap, more weapons, and a host of new Perks, maps and challenges.
